GPT-4o vs Numa 1 in finance
Every finance benchmark where both have a score (OpenAI and Moneda). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 1
- GPT-4o only
- 5
- Numa 1 only
- 6
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- GPT-4o
- Numa 1
FinanceQA accuracy (total, 0-1), higher is better
GPT-4o:0.392 (better)Numa 1:0.355
Benchmark
GPT-4o
Numa 1
14 benchmarks, 1 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
FinanceQAaccuracy (total, 0-1), higher is better
BizFinBenchaverage score across 9 tasks, higher is better
Not scored
FinanceBench% correct, no filing given (150-question sample), higher is better
Not scored
FinLFQAevidence attribution F1, higher is better
Not scored
FinLFQALLM-as-judge answer score (/15), higher is better
Not scored
FinSearchCompGlobal subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
FinSearchCompGreater China subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
InvestorBenchcumulative return %, higher is better
Not scored
K-FinHallubinary detection F1, higher is better
Not scored
Moneda CiteBenchFactual share of linked claims %, higher is better
Not scored
Moneda FilingsBench% correct (private split), higher is better
Not scored
Moneda PortfolioBenchPortfolio tasks, % correct, higher is better
Not scored
Open FinLLM Leaderboardbalanced score (mean of text/vision/audio averages), higher is better
Not scored
Finance Agent BenchmarkPartial credit % on the 27 public questions (run by Moneda; not comparable, unranked), higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.