Gemini 2.5 Pro vs grok-4
Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Google and xAI). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 2
- Gemini 2.5 Pro only
- 3
- grok-4 only
- 3
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro
- grok-4
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation) Level I accuracy %, higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:95.7 (better)grok-4:94.8Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation) Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:78.2 (better)grok-4:71.2FinDeepResearch overall accuracy score (0-100), higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:36.2grok-4:37.3 (better)
Benchmark
Gemini 2.5 Pro
grok-4
10 benchmarks, 3 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level I accuracy %, higher is better
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
FinDeepResearchoverall accuracy score (0-100), higher is better
Market-Benchmean MAE, lower is better
Not scored
Advanced Financial Reasoning at Scale (CFA Level III evaluation)overall % (mean of MCQ and essay), higher is better
Not scored
FAITHoverall accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
FinSearchCompGlobal subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
FinSearchCompGreater China subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
K-FinHallubinary detection F1, higher is better
Not scored
LiveTradeBenchcumulative return %, higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.
