Claude Opus 4.1 vs grok-4

Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Anthropic and xAI). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.

Shared benchmarks
2
Claude Opus 4.1 only
1
grok-4 only
3

Shared benchmarks, side by side

Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.

  • Claude Opus 4.1
  • grok-4
Benchmark
Claude Opus 4.1
grok-4

8 benchmarks, 3 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.

Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level I accuracy %, higher is better
94.6
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
94.8
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
73.4
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
71.2
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
LiveTradeBenchcumulative return %, higher is better
3.7
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 5 Nov 2025)
4.3
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 5 Nov 2025)
Market-Benchmean MAE, lower is better
Not scored
443.2
marketbench.ai leaderboard (Official board, date not stated)
CAIA (Crypto AI Agent Benchmark)accuracy % (majority vote, 5 runs), higher is better
56.3
Paper Tables 2-3 (Reported by the authors, 17 Jan 2026)
Not scored
FinDeepResearchoverall accuracy score (0-100), higher is better
Not scored
37.3
OpenFinArena leaderboard (Official board, 15 Oct 2025)
FinSearchCompGlobal subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
68.9
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 16 Sept 2025)
FinSearchCompGreater China subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
51.9
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 16 Sept 2025)

Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.