Leaderboard, made by Jiaxuan Lu, Kong Wang et al.

FinToolBench

Tests whether LLM agents can call real financial tools to answer questions while staying timely, on intent and in the right regulatory domain.

Best reported

0.822

Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)Google

Soft Score

1 Aug 2026

FinToolBench v2 (arXiv, 2026-08-01)

Soft Score, higher is better. 7 models.

Updated 1 Aug 2026

  1. Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)0.822
  2. Claude Sonnet 4.50.712
  3. Grok-3-beta0.685
  4. GPT-5.40.625
  5. Doubao-Seed-1.60.463
  6. Qwen3-8B0.404
  7. GLM-4.7-Flash0.379

FinToolBench v2 (arXiv, 2026-08-01)

Soft Score, higher is better. 7 models.

Updated 1 Aug 2026

  1. 1Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)0.822
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 4.50.712
  3. 3Grok-3-beta0.685
  4. 4GPT-5.40.625
  5. 5Doubao-Seed-1.60.463
  6. 6Qwen3-8B0.404
  7. 7GLM-4.7-Flash0.379
FinToolBench leaderboard (Soft Score, higher is better)
1Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)Google0.822Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
2Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic0.712Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
3Grok-3-betaxAI0.685Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
4GPT-5.4OpenAI0.625Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
5Doubao-Seed-1.6ByteDance0.463Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
6Qwen3-8BQwen0.404Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
7GLM-4.7-FlashZhipu AI0.379Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026

Full details for FinToolBench