Jiaxuan Lu, Kong Wang et al., 2026

FinToolBench

Tests whether LLM agents can call real financial tools to answer questions while staying timely, on intent and in the right regulatory domain.

Best reported

0.822

Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)Google

Soft Score

Reported by the authors, 1 Aug 2026

About this benchmark

Size
295 questions over 760 executable free-tier tools; 7 models
Public split
The full question set and tool manifest are released on GitHub.
Grading
Tool calls are executed for real. GPT-5.1 judges answer quality (Soft Score, averaged over three runs) and flags timeliness, intent and domain mismatches per tool call.
Licence
Not stated
Submission
No leaderboard. Run the open evaluation code yourself.
Products allowed
Models only
Latest version
v2 (arXiv, 2026-08-01)
What it does not cover
Paid terminals, brokerage and order routing, most jurisdictions.

Results

7 models
Leaderboard

Each score shows who reported it: the benchmark's authors (quoted from their paper), the benchmark's official board, or Moneda (run with the benchmark's own grader and rules). We do not copy other aggregators.

FinToolBench v2 (arXiv, 2026-08-01)

Soft Score, higher is better. 7 models.

Updated 1 Aug 2026

  1. Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)0.822
  2. Claude Sonnet 4.50.712
  3. Grok-3-beta0.685
  4. GPT-5.40.625
  5. Doubao-Seed-1.60.463
  6. Qwen3-8B0.404
  7. GLM-4.7-Flash0.379

FinToolBench v2 (arXiv, 2026-08-01)

Soft Score, higher is better. 7 models.

Updated 1 Aug 2026

  1. 1Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)0.822
  2. 2Claude Sonnet 4.50.712
  3. 3Grok-3-beta0.685
  4. 4GPT-5.40.625
  5. 5Doubao-Seed-1.60.463
  6. 6Qwen3-8B0.404
  7. 7GLM-4.7-Flash0.379
FinToolBench leaderboard (Soft Score, higher is better)
1Gemini-3.1-Pro (preview)Google0.822Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
2Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic0.712Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
3Grok-3-betaxAI0.685Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
4GPT-5.4OpenAI0.625Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
5Doubao-Seed-1.6ByteDance0.463Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
6Qwen3-8BQwen0.404Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026
7GLM-4.7-FlashZhipu AI0.379Full 295 questions, GPT-5.1 judge, mean of 3 repeatsPaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, reported 1 Aug 2026 · checked 6 Nov 2026

Last checked 6 Nov 2026. Something out of date or wrong? Send a correction.