Numa 1 vs Wonder Full in finance
Every finance benchmark where both have a score. Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 1
- Numa 1 only
- 6
- Wonder Full only
- 3
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Numa 1
- Wonder Full
Benchmark
Numa 1
Wonder Full
12 benchmarks, 0 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
FinanceQAaccuracy (total, 0-1), higher is better
Not scored
FinanceBench% correct, no filing given (150-question sample), higher is better
Not scored
FinSearchCompGlobal subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
FinSearchCompGreater China subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Moneda CiteBenchFactual share of linked claims %, higher is better
Not scored
Moneda FilingsBench% correct (private split), higher is better
Not scored
Moneda PortfolioBenchPortfolio tasks, % correct, higher is better
Not scored
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB)accuracy % (v1.1), higher is better
Not scored
Finance Agent BenchmarkPartial credit % on the 27 public questions (run by Moneda; not comparable, unranked), higher is better
Not scored
Finance Agent BenchmarkPartial Credit accuracy % (v2.1), higher is better
Not scored
Vals Finance Indexindex accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Tax Agent Benchaccuracy % (all-pass x citation factor), higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.