Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.6-Plus in finance

Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Moonshot AI and Qwen). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.

Shared benchmarks
2
Kimi K2.6 only
1
Qwen3.6-Plus only
0

Shared benchmarks, side by side

Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.

  • Kimi K2.6
  • Qwen3.6-Plus

  • KTD-Fin total return %, higher is better

    Kimi K2.6:-24.2
    Qwen3.6-Plus:85.3 (better)

  • PortBench CEPS (0-1), higher is better

    Kimi K2.6:0.274
    Qwen3.6-Plus:0.300 (better)

  • PortBench mean QA score (0-1), higher is better

    Kimi K2.6:0.511
    Qwen3.6-Plus:0.783 (better)
Benchmark
Kimi K2.6
Qwen3.6-Plus

4 benchmarks, 3 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.

KTD-Fintotal return %, higher is better
-24.2
Paper Table 4 (Reported by the authors, 27 May 2026)
85.3
Paper Table 4 (Reported by the authors, 27 May 2026)
PortBenchCEPS (0-1), higher is better
0.274
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026)
0.300
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026)
PortBenchmean QA score (0-1), higher is better
0.511
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026)
0.783
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026)
IPO Finance Agentmean rubric score %, higher is better
68
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 30 Jun 2026)
Not scored

Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.