Leaderboard

PortBench

Multi-asset portfolio management across six asset classes. It pairs a static QA set with a five-stage decision pipeline whose allocation stage is scored on how well it captures cross-asset correlation, under stress windows and three risk profiles.

Best reported

0.384

GLM-5.1Zhipu AI

CEPS (0-1)

9 Oct 2026

PortBench arXiv v6 (2026-10-09)

CEPS (0-1), higher is better. 10 models.

Updated 9 Oct 2026

  1. GLM-5.10.384
  2. Qwen3.6-Plus0.300
  3. Qwen3.7-Max0.292
  4. Kimi K2.60.274
  5. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B0.272
  6. DS-V4-Pro0.266
  7. DB-2.0-Pro0.263
  8. HY3-Preview0.258
  9. DB-2.0-Lite0.244
  10. DS-V4-Flash0.226

PortBench arXiv v6 (2026-10-09)

CEPS (0-1), higher is better. 10 models.

Updated 9 Oct 2026

  1. 1GLM-5.10.384
  2. 2Qwen3.6-Plus0.300
  3. 3Qwen3.7-Max0.292
  4. 4Kimi K2.60.274
  5. 5Qwen3.6-35B-A3B0.272
  6. 6DS-V4-Pro0.266
  7. 7DB-2.0-Pro0.263
  8. 8HY3-Preview0.258
  9. 9DB-2.0-Lite0.244
  10. 10DS-V4-Flash0.226
PortBench leaderboard (CEPS (0-1), higher is better)
1GLM-5.1Zhipu AI0.384pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
2Qwen3.6-PlusQwen0.300pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
3Qwen3.7-MaxQwen0.292pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
4Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI0.274pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
5Qwen3.6-35B-A3BQwen0.272pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
6DS-V4-ProDeepSeek0.266pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
7DB-2.0-ProNot stated0.263pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
8HY3-PreviewTencent0.258pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
9DB-2.0-LiteNot stated0.244pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
10DS-V4-FlashDeepSeek0.226pipeline, balanced risk profilePaper Table 2
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026

PortBench arXiv v6 (2026-10-09)

mean QA score (0-1), higher is better. 10 models.

Updated 9 Oct 2026

  1. DS-V4-Flash0.819
  2. Qwen3.7-Max0.819
  3. DS-V4-Pro0.818
  4. DB-2.0-Lite0.804
  5. DB-2.0-Pro0.787
  6. Qwen3.6-Plus0.783
  7. GLM-5.10.757
  8. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B0.684
  9. HY3-Preview0.624
  10. Kimi K2.60.511

PortBench arXiv v6 (2026-10-09)

mean QA score (0-1), higher is better. 10 models.

Updated 9 Oct 2026

  1. 1DS-V4-Flash0.819
  2. 1Qwen3.7-Max0.819
  3. 3DS-V4-Pro0.818
  4. 4DB-2.0-Lite0.804
  5. 5DB-2.0-Pro0.787
  6. 6Qwen3.6-Plus0.783
  7. 7GLM-5.10.757
  8. 8Qwen3.6-35B-A3B0.684
  9. 9HY3-Preview0.624
  10. 10Kimi K2.60.511
PortBench leaderboard (mean QA score (0-1), higher is better)
1DS-V4-FlashDeepSeek0.819static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
1Qwen3.7-MaxQwen0.819static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
3DS-V4-ProDeepSeek0.818static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
4DB-2.0-LiteNot stated0.804static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
5DB-2.0-ProNot stated0.787static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
6Qwen3.6-PlusQwen0.783static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
7GLM-5.1Zhipu AI0.757static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
8Qwen3.6-35B-A3BQwen0.684static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
9HY3-PreviewTencent0.624static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026
10Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI0.511static QA, mean over T1-T7 (secondary)Paper Table 1
Reported by the authors, 9 Oct 2026

Full details for PortBench