Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3-32B in finance
Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Google and Qwen). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 2
- Gemini 2.5 Pro only
- 4
- Qwen3-32B only
- 1
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Qwen3-32B
FAITH overall accuracy %, higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:91.9 (better)Qwen3-32B:73.9K-FinHallu binary detection F1, higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:0.849 (better)Qwen3-32B:0.732
Benchmark
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Qwen3-32B
8 benchmarks, 2 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
FAITHoverall accuracy %, higher is better
K-FinHallubinary detection F1, higher is better
BizFinBenchaverage score across 9 tasks, higher is better
Not scored
Advanced Financial Reasoning at Scale (CFA Level III evaluation)overall % (mean of MCQ and essay), higher is better
Not scored
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level I accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
Not scored
FinDeepResearchoverall accuracy score (0-100), higher is better
Not scored
FinSearchCompGlobal subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.
