Gemini 2.5 Pro vs gpt-5
Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Google and OpenAI). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 2
- Gemini 2.5 Pro only
- 3
- gpt-5 only
- 5
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro
- gpt-5
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation) Level I accuracy %, higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:95.7gpt-5:96.1 (better)Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation) Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:78.2 (better)gpt-5:71.8K-FinHallu binary detection F1, higher is better
Gemini 2.5 Pro:0.849 (better)gpt-5:0.823
Benchmark
Gemini 2.5 Pro
gpt-5
11 benchmarks, 3 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level I accuracy %, higher is better
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
K-FinHallubinary detection F1, higher is better
AI-Tradercumulative return %, higher is better
Not scored
CAIA (Crypto AI Agent Benchmark)accuracy % (majority vote, 5 runs), higher is better
Not scored
Advanced Financial Reasoning at Scale (CFA Level III evaluation)overall % (mean of MCQ and essay), higher is better
Not scored
FAITHoverall accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
FinDeepResearchoverall accuracy score (0-100), higher is better
Not scored
LiveTradeBenchcumulative return %, higher is better
Not scored
PRBench Financeweighted rubric score (0-100), higher is better
Not scored
StockBenchfinal return %, higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.
