Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro in finance

Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Google and Google). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.

Shared benchmarks
3
Gemini 2.5 Flash only
2
Gemini 2.5 Pro only
3

Shared benchmarks, side by side

Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmark
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro

9 benchmarks, 3 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.

Advanced Financial Reasoning at Scale (CFA Level III evaluation)overall % (mean of MCQ and essay), higher is better
77.3
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 22 Sept 2025)
75.9
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 22 Sept 2025)
FAITHoverall accuracy %, higher is better
88.7
Paper Table 3 (Reported by the authors, 24 Oct 2025)
91.9
Paper Table 3 (Reported by the authors, 24 Oct 2025)
K-FinHallubinary detection F1, higher is better
0.860
Paper Table 3 (Reported by the authors, 28 May 2026)
0.849
Paper Table 3 (Reported by the authors, 28 May 2026)
AI-Tradercumulative return %, higher is better
-0.060
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 1 Dec 2025)
Not scored
Not scored
95.7
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
Not scored
78.2
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
FinDeepResearchoverall accuracy score (0-100), higher is better
Not scored
36.2
OpenFinArena leaderboard (Official board, 15 Oct 2025)
FinSearchCompGlobal subset average accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
42.6
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 16 Sept 2025)
FinTrustsafety harmfulness score (1-10, GPT-4.1 mini judge), lower is better
6.2
Paper Table 7 (App. A.2) (Reported by the authors, 17 Oct 2025)
Not scored

Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.