Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Opus 4.1 in finance

Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Anthropic and Anthropic). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.

Shared benchmarks
2
Claude Opus 4 only
1
Claude Opus 4.1 only
1

Shared benchmarks, side by side

Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.

  • Claude Opus 4
  • Claude Opus 4.1

  • CAIA (Crypto AI Agent Benchmark) accuracy % (majority vote, 5 runs), higher is better

    Claude Opus 4:57.3 (better)
    Claude Opus 4.1:56.3

  • LiveTradeBench cumulative return %, higher is better

    Claude Opus 4:3.9 (better)
    Claude Opus 4.1:3.7
Benchmark
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4.1

5 benchmarks, 2 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.

CAIA (Crypto AI Agent Benchmark)accuracy % (majority vote, 5 runs), higher is better
57.3
Paper Tables 2-3 (Reported by the authors, 17 Jan 2026)
56.3
Paper Tables 2-3 (Reported by the authors, 17 Jan 2026)
LiveTradeBenchcumulative return %, higher is better
3.9
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 5 Nov 2025)
3.7
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 5 Nov 2025)
Advanced Financial Reasoning at Scale (CFA Level III evaluation)overall % (mean of MCQ and essay), higher is better
74.9
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 22 Sept 2025)
Not scored
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level I accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
94.6
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
Not scored
73.4
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)

Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.