Claude Opus 4.1 vs gpt-5

Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Anthropic and OpenAI). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.

Shared benchmarks
3
Claude Opus 4.1 only
0
gpt-5 only
4

Shared benchmarks, side by side

Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.

  • Claude Opus 4.1
  • gpt-5
Benchmark
Claude Opus 4.1
gpt-5

8 benchmarks, 4 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.

CAIA (Crypto AI Agent Benchmark)accuracy % (majority vote, 5 runs), higher is better
56.3
Paper Tables 2-3 (Reported by the authors, 17 Jan 2026)
67.4
Paper Tables 2-3 (Reported by the authors, 17 Jan 2026)
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level I accuracy %, higher is better
94.6
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
96.1
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
73.4
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
71.8
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
LiveTradeBenchcumulative return %, higher is better
3.7
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 5 Nov 2025)
5.3
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 5 Nov 2025)
AI-Tradercumulative return %, higher is better
Not scored
1.6
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 1 Dec 2025)
K-FinHallubinary detection F1, higher is better
Not scored
0.823
Paper Table 3 (Reported by the authors, 28 May 2026)
PRBench Financeweighted rubric score (0-100), higher is better
Not scored
51.3
Scale Labs leaderboard (Official board, date not stated)
StockBenchfinal return %, higher is better
Not scored
0.300
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 2 Mar 2026)

Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.