Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 vs Wonder Full
Every finance benchmark where both have a score. Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 2
- Qwen 3.8 Max 0902 only
- 0
- Wonder Full only
- 2
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
- Wonder Full
Vals Finance Index index accuracy %, higher is better
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902:61.7Wonder Full:64.5 (better)Tax Agent Bench accuracy % (all-pass x citation factor), higher is better
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902:49.7 (better)Wonder Full:43
Benchmark
Qwen 3.8 Max 0902
Wonder Full
4 benchmarks, 2 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
Vals Finance Indexindex accuracy %, higher is better
Tax Agent Benchaccuracy % (all-pass x citation factor), higher is better
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB)accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Finance Agent BenchmarkPartial Credit accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.