GLM 5.3 vs Wonder Full

Every finance benchmark where both have a score. Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.

Shared benchmarks
2
GLM 5.3 only
0
Wonder Full only
2

Shared benchmarks, side by side

Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.

  • GLM 5.3
  • Wonder Full

  • Finance Agent Benchmark Partial Credit accuracy %, higher is better

    GLM 5.3:65
    Wonder Full:67.6 (better)

  • Vals Finance Index index accuracy %, higher is better

    GLM 5.3:60.5
    Wonder Full:64.5 (better)
Benchmark
GLM 5.3
Wonder Full

4 benchmarks, 2 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.

Finance Agent BenchmarkPartial Credit accuracy %, higher is better
65
Vals.ai leaderboard (Official board, 29 Oct 2026)
67.6
Vals.ai leaderboard (Official board, 29 Oct 2026)
Vals Finance Indexindex accuracy %, higher is better
60.5
Vals.ai leaderboard (Official board, 29 Oct 2026)
64.5
Vals.ai leaderboard (Official board, 29 Oct 2026)
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB)accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
75
Vals.ai leaderboard (Official board, 29 Oct 2026)
Tax Agent Benchaccuracy % (all-pass x citation factor), higher is better
Not scored
43
Vals.ai leaderboard (Official board, 29 Oct 2026)

Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.