DeepSeek-V3.1 vs GPT-OSS-120B in finance

Every finance benchmark where both have a score (DeepSeek and OpenAI). Data refreshed 6 Nov 2026.

Shared benchmarks
2
DeepSeek-V3.1 only
2
GPT-OSS-120B only
1

Shared benchmarks, side by side

Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.

  • DeepSeek-V3.1
  • GPT-OSS-120B

  • CAIA (Crypto AI Agent Benchmark) accuracy % (majority vote, 5 runs), higher is better

    DeepSeek-V3.1:49.2
    GPT-OSS-120B:62.9 (better)

  • StockBench final return %, higher is better

    DeepSeek-V3.1:1.1 (better)
    GPT-OSS-120B:-0.900
Benchmark
DeepSeek-V3.1
GPT-OSS-120B

6 benchmarks, 2 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.

CAIA (Crypto AI Agent Benchmark)accuracy % (majority vote, 5 runs), higher is better
49.2
Paper Tables 2-3 (Reported by the authors, 17 Jan 2026)
62.9
Paper Tables 2-3 (Reported by the authors, 17 Jan 2026)
StockBenchfinal return %, higher is better
1.1
Paper Table 2 (Reported by the authors, 2 Mar 2026)
-0.900
Paper Table 2 (same as project leaderboard) (Reported by the authors, 6 Nov 2026)
AI-Tradercumulative return %, higher is better
8.4
Paper Table 1 (Reported by the authors, 1 Dec 2025)
Not scored
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level I accuracy %, higher is better
90.9
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
Not scored
Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams (CFA mock-exam evaluation)Level III constructed-response score %, higher is better
70.8
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 9 Dec 2025)
Not scored
PolyBenchConfidence-Weighted Return (CWR) %, higher is better
Not scored
-17.8
Paper Table 5 (Reported by the authors, 3 Apr 2026)

Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.