Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder in finance
Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Anthropic and Meta). Data refreshed 3 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 2
- Claude Opus 5.5 only
- 5
- Muse Wonder only
- 0
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Muse Wonder
Ramp Accounting Bench mean reward % (criteria, mean of 3 attempts), higher is better
Claude Opus 5.5:50.5 (better)Muse Wonder:48.7Visa Agentic Commerce Benchmark pass rate %, higher is better
Claude Opus 5.5:62.2Muse Wonder:82.2 (better)
Benchmark
Claude Opus 5.5
Muse Wonder
7 benchmarks, 2 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
Ramp Accounting Benchmean reward % (criteria, mean of 3 attempts), higher is better
Visa Agentic Commerce Benchmarkpass rate %, higher is better
FinanceBench% correct, no filing given (150-question sample), higher is better
Not scored
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB)accuracy % (v1.1), higher is better
Not scored
Finance Agent BenchmarkPartial Credit accuracy % (v2.1), higher is better
Not scored
Vals Finance Indexindex accuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Tax Agent Benchaccuracy % (all-pass x citation factor), higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.