Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon in finance
Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Anthropic and Google). Data refreshed 2 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 5
- Claude Opus 5.5 only
- 1
- Gemini 4 Argon only
- 1
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Gemini 4 Argon
Ramp Accounting Bench mean reward % (criteria, mean of 3 attempts), higher is better
Claude Opus 5.5:50.5Gemini 4 Argon:61.1 (better)Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB) accuracy % (v1.1), higher is better
Claude Opus 5.5:75.8 (better)Gemini 4 Argon:74.8Finance Agent Benchmark Partial Credit accuracy % (v2.1), higher is better
Claude Opus 5.5:67.8 (better)Gemini 4 Argon:67.7Vals Finance Index index accuracy %, higher is better
Claude Opus 5.5:65.6 (better)Gemini 4 Argon:64.9Tax Agent Bench accuracy % (all-pass x citation factor), higher is better
Claude Opus 5.5:45.6 (better)Gemini 4 Argon:44.6
7 benchmarks, 5 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.