Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra in finance
Every finance benchmark where both have a score (Anthropic and OpenAI). Data refreshed 3 Nov 2026.
- Shared benchmarks
- 2
- Claude Fable 5.1 only
- 3
- GPT-6.1 Terra only
- 0
Shared benchmarks, side by side
Each benchmark is drawn on its own scale. Bars are not comparable across rows.
- Claude Fable 5.1
- GPT-6.1 Terra
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB) accuracy % (v1.1), higher is better
Claude Fable 5.1:76.7 (better)GPT-6.1 Terra:73.3Visa Agentic Commerce Benchmark pass rate %, higher is better
Claude Fable 5.1:75.6 (better)GPT-6.1 Terra:51.1
Benchmark
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6.1 Terra
5 benchmarks, 2 scored for both. Bold marks the better score where both have one.
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB)accuracy % (v1.1), higher is better
Visa Agentic Commerce Benchmarkpass rate %, higher is better
Ramp Accounting Benchmean reward % (criteria, mean of 3 attempts), higher is better
Not scored
MortgageTaxaccuracy %, higher is better
Not scored
Tax Agent Benchaccuracy % (all-pass x citation factor), higher is better
Not scored
Scores from different benchmarks use different scales and are not added up. Settings can differ between sources; see each leaderboard for details.