Vals AI
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB)
Agents build full Excel financial models of the kind used in investment banking and private equity, from a scenario plus source files. Categories: LBO, DCF, M&A, operating models, comps, dataroom summaries and misc.
About this benchmark
- Size
- 103 tasks (1 public, 51 private validation, 51 test)
- Public split
- 1 task
- Grading
- Template mode checks exact cell matches against a gold model. Scratch mode uses a partial-credit rubric scored by an LLM judge (GPT-6 Luna). Workbooks are recalculated in Excel. Headline is the mean over 7 equally weighted categories.
- Licence
- proprietary
- Submission
- Not stated
- Products allowed
- Not stated
- Latest version
- v1.1
- What it does not cover
- No research or retrieval from live filings, and no judgement on investment decisions.
Results
10 modelsEach score shows who reported it: the benchmark's authors (quoted from their paper), the benchmark's official board, or Moneda (run with the benchmark's own grader and rules). We do not copy other aggregators.
Best value: GPT-6.1 Terra, 73.3 at $0.560 per question (cheapest within 5% of the top score)
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB): score vs cost
Score against cost per test. Up and to the left is better.
Updated 29 Oct 2026
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB) v1.1
accuracy %, higher is better. 10 models.
Updated 29 Oct 2026
- Claude Fable 5.176.7
- Gemini 4 Carbon76.5
- Claude Sonnet 5.575.9
- Claude Opus 5.575.8
- Wonder Full75
- Gemini 4 Argon74.8
- GPT-6.1 Terra73.3
- Gemini 3.8 Flash72.9
- GPT-6 Astra72.7
- Wonder72.5
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB): cost
cost per test item (USD), lower is better. 10 models.
Updated 29 Oct 2026
- GPT-6.1 Terra0.560
- Wonder Full4.6
- Wonder5.6
- Gemini 4 Carbon5.8
- GPT-6 Astra5.8
- Gemini 3.8 Flash8.2
- Claude Sonnet 5.58.8
- Claude Opus 5.511.0
- Gemini 4 Argon11.8
- Claude Fable 5.115.9
Excel Modeling Benchmark (EMB) v1.1
accuracy %, higher is better. 10 models.
Updated 29 Oct 2026
- 1Claude Fable 5.176.7
- 2Gemini 4 Carbon76.5
- 3Claude Sonnet 5.575.9
- 4Claude Opus 5.575.8
- 5Wonder Full75
- 6Gemini 4 Argon74.8
- 7GPT-6.1 Terra73.3
- 8Gemini 3.8 Flash72.9
- 9GPT-6 Astra72.7
- 10Wonder72.5
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic | 76.7 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Gemini 4 Carbon | 76.5 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 | |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Anthropic | 75.9 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Anthropic | 75.8 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 |
| 5 | Wonder Full | Not stated | 75 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 |
| 6 | Gemini 4 Argon | 74.8 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 | |
| 7 | GPT-6.1 Terra | OpenAI | 73.3 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 |
| 8 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | 72.9 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 | |
| 9 | GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI | 72.7 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 |
| 10 | Wonder | Not stated | 72.5 | v1.1 test set | Vals.ai leaderboard Official board, 29 Oct 2026 |
Papers and links
Last checked 1 Nov 2026. Something out of date or wrong? Send a correction.
