# Moneda CiteBench

Whether the sources a system cites say what it claims. The system writes a short research note on a company, with sources, and every linked claim is checked against the page it links to.

## Facts

- Maker: Moneda (Germany)
- Year: 2026
- Use case: Financial Verifiability
- Size: 100 research notes (about 1,500 claims) on companies in the US, Europe and Latin America
- Public split: Yes, companies rotate each release
- Grading: An LLM judge checks each linked claim against the fetched source: factual, hallucinated (the source does not say it) or non-verifiable (dead or dynamic link). Two people blind-audit 15% of verdicts.
- Licence: Items CC BY 4.0, harness MIT
- Submission: Open harness at release
- Products allowed: Yes
- What it does not cover: Whether the note's conclusions are sound, and claims that carry no link at all beyond counting them.
- Status: Moneda Bench, first results coming
- Method: Each system gets the same plain retail prompt per company. Claims are split into numeric and descriptive. The judge is checked against people on a held-out set before the rubric is tuned, and we report agreement next to the scores. Below 0.7 agreement the board is labelled experimental and not ranked.
- Last checked: 1 Nov 2026
- Links: none recorded
- Directory page: https://benchmarks.finance/benchmarks/moneda-citebench/
- Leaderboard: https://benchmarks.finance/leaderboards/moneda-citebench/

## Results

First results coming.

Source: https://benchmarks.finance/benchmarks/moneda-citebench/

Created and maintained by Moneda.